DESTRUCTIVE TESTING AND FIELD EXPERIENCE WITH HDPE MORTARS
The following article originally appeared in American Fireworks News #72 (1987)
by Ken Kosanke
In an earlier article on High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) mortars, results
from an initial series of tests were published (+PGI Bulletin+ No. 54, p. 5).
Those results will not be repeated here. This article continues by presenting
the results from an additional test, a summary of the author's field
experience since the first article, and comments on HDPE mortar use in
England by Rev. Ron Lancaster.
Destructive Mortar Tests
Three tests were performed in which a 22" long 3" diameter HDPE mortar (SDR =
13.5, resin type PE3408) was staked above ground and a 3" salute was exploded
in the bottom of the mortar. Approximate determinations were made of: 1) the
percent weight loss of the mortar due to fragments leaving the mortar, 2) the
radius and area through which fragments were found to have been propelled,
and 3) the shape and weight of typical fragments. In the three tests, the
mortars were at three different temperatures (50, 400, and 800 F); however,
no temperature dependence was observed in these very limited tests. On
average, 6% of the mortar's weight was lost as fragments (not counting the
loss of the wooden mortar plug). The fragments were found to have been
propelled to a maximum distance of approximately 100 feet, which corresponds
to an area of about 30,000 square feet. A typical fragment was stretched to
about 1/3 its original thickness, was roughly leaf-like in appearance, and
weighed about 1/2 ounce. Judging from the shape and weight of the fragments,
it is estimated the serious injury to a properly clothed and positioned
shooter, even if struck by one of the few fragments, was highly unlikely.
As a comparison, two similar tests were performed using 24" long 3" diameter
PVC mortars (Sch. 40). In this case, nearly the same range of mortar
temperatures were used (100 and 800 F). As above, no temperature dependance
was observed. On average, 80% of the mortar's weight was lost as fragments.
Those fragments were frond to have been propelled to a maximum diameter of
approximately 175 feet, which corresponds to an area of about 100,000 square
feet. A typical fragment retained it original thickness, had sharp edges and
jagged points, and weighed one or two ounces. Judging from the shape and
weight of the fragments it is estimated that serious injury to a properly
clothed and positioned shooter was very likely if struck by any of the large
number of fragments.
The stretching thin of HDPE mortar fragments causes them to be slowed more
rapidly after being thrust into the air from a bursting mortar (they are more
like a feather than a rock). However, this stretching has an additional
safety benefit. The mechanical energy that is consumed in thinly stretching
the fragment is, in the process, converted into thermal energy, raising the
temperature of the fragments. Calculations suggest that the stretching will
result in a temperature rise of about 400 F. The HDPE fragments are somewhat
flexible to begin with, but they become more flexible as their temperature
rises.
From these limited tests, it seems fairly clear that HDPE mortars present
minimal danger to nearby persons and equipment in the event of a shell
detonation within them. Certainly they present far less danger than PVC
mortars similarly stressed.
Limited Field Experience
During the recent season, HDPE mortars were used by the author on four
displays in which approximately 800 three to six inch shells were fired. (The
equipment used to fire the shows positions the mortars in very close
proximity to each other in steel racks. The so-called dense-pack set-up was
described in a paper appearing in Pyrotechnica XI .) Although several flower
pots were observed to have occurred, only two mortars were damaged. In one
case the plug blew out and the bottom of the mortar split for about three
inches. In the other case, the plug blew out and a bulge occurred about half
way up the mortar. In neither case were any fragments generated (except for
the mortar plugs) and there was absolutely no damage to the rack or to
adjacent mortars.
Lancaster's Comments
The following is an abridged quote from a recent letter from Rev. Ron
Lancaster, a noted author and pyrotechnician.
-
-
"I notice that you were asking a question about polyethylene mortars and
really do know quite a bit about this and think I can say that I have
pioneered the use of these materials in this country. ... Quite near to us we
have one of the two principal manufacturers of high density polyethylene pipe
and I bought material from them over ten years ago and can say that we are
still using the original tubes that we bought from them then. We have many
hundreds of these now and we buy a few more each year. ... So far we have
never had a serious accident with any of them and I have often wondered what
would happen if, for example, a three inch salute went in such a tube. It
did, in fact, happen last year and it burst roughly half-way up the tube and
I am happy to say that it 'belled' the tube in the centre ... and at one
point the heat was sufficient to actually melt the plastic in the bell
portion to let the gas come out. This piece of information was really quite
useful to us and really I was quite gratified to see what had happened. ... I
think that you will find that these mortars are very useful indeed and much
superior to paper.
With every good wish,
Yours sincerely, Ron Lancaster
P.S. Needless to say we never use PVC."
Figure 1 -- Comparison of Failure Modes of PVC and HDPE Mortars
PVC HDPE
Less Ductile Mortar More Ductile Mortar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Condition | Sketch | Condition | Sketch
| (cross section) | | (cross section)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | |
| | |
| | |
High internal | | High internal |
pressure | | pressure |
| | |
| | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapid increase in | | Rapid increase in |
pressure exceeds | | pressure exceeds |
capacity. Pipe ex- | | capacity. Pipe ex- |
pands but frac- | | pands and strength |
tures develop as | | is reduced as |
elastic limit is | | diameter increases |
soon exceeded. | | and wall thickness |
| | decreases. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Very high pressure |
| | continues. Elastic |
Many sharp high | | limit is exceeded |
velocity fragments | | and thin areas |
are generated. | | develop in mortar |
| | wall as it is |
| | stretched. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Very high pressure |
| | continues. Wall is |
| | continued to be |
| | stretched thin |
| | until one or more |
| | tears develop |
| | venting pressure. |
| | Few if any frag- |
| | ments are pro- |
| | duced. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------